<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lyric Opera to offer a balanced, conservative lineup next season, with 11% fewer performances</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chicagoclassicalreview.com/2010/01/lyric-opera-to-offer-a-balanced-largely-conservative-lineup-next-season-with-11-fewer-performances/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chicagoclassicalreview.com/2010/01/lyric-opera-to-offer-a-balanced-largely-conservative-lineup-next-season-with-11-fewer-performances/</link>
	<description>Chicago&#039;s newest and most comprehensive source for all classical music news and reviews.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 16:41:44 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lori Dana</title>
		<link>http://chicagoclassicalreview.com/2010/01/lyric-opera-to-offer-a-balanced-largely-conservative-lineup-next-season-with-11-fewer-performances/comment-page-1/#comment-947</link>
		<dc:creator>Lori Dana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 19:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoclassicalreview.com/?p=4342#comment-947</guid>
		<description>As a marketing professional and new subscriber (2009-2010 is my first season as a subscription holder), I understand the value of Lyric altering it&#039;s schedule and diversifying it&#039;s subscription offerings.  Subscription marketing innovations allowed me to finally pursue the interest in opera that I have had for a number of years.  

I believe that Lyric is akin to a museum in that it not only preserves a classic musical genre for future generations, but it has a responsibility to educate it&#039;s patrons and the public at large about exciting and innovative new works.  In order to accomplish this goal (and ensure it&#039;s survival by perpetuating it&#039;s audience), Lyric must continually seek out compelling marketing strategies.

A recent article on increased museum attendance in Crain&#039;s Chicago Business pointed out the following:

&quot;The report also showed a significant increase in the number of people coming to the museum and zoos on free days. That was up 24% to just over 1.4 million in 2009.&quot;


In light of next year&#039;s performance cuts, perhaps this is also a valid marketing idea for Lyric Opera.  Do one free performance per season. Tickets for non-subscribers (or perhaps for potential patrons age 30 and under?) reserved on a first-come, first-served basis. THAT might cultivate a new, younger audience for the opera!  I hope the administration and board at Lyric consider what similar increases in attendance could mean for the future of grand opera in Chicago...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a marketing professional and new subscriber (2009-2010 is my first season as a subscription holder), I understand the value of Lyric altering it&#8217;s schedule and diversifying it&#8217;s subscription offerings.  Subscription marketing innovations allowed me to finally pursue the interest in opera that I have had for a number of years.  </p>
<p>I believe that Lyric is akin to a museum in that it not only preserves a classic musical genre for future generations, but it has a responsibility to educate it&#8217;s patrons and the public at large about exciting and innovative new works.  In order to accomplish this goal (and ensure it&#8217;s survival by perpetuating it&#8217;s audience), Lyric must continually seek out compelling marketing strategies.</p>
<p>A recent article on increased museum attendance in Crain&#8217;s Chicago Business pointed out the following:</p>
<p>&#8220;The report also showed a significant increase in the number of people coming to the museum and zoos on free days. That was up 24% to just over 1.4 million in 2009.&#8221;</p>
<p>In light of next year&#8217;s performance cuts, perhaps this is also a valid marketing idea for Lyric Opera.  Do one free performance per season. Tickets for non-subscribers (or perhaps for potential patrons age 30 and under?) reserved on a first-come, first-served basis. THAT might cultivate a new, younger audience for the opera!  I hope the administration and board at Lyric consider what similar increases in attendance could mean for the future of grand opera in Chicago&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Sarchet</title>
		<link>http://chicagoclassicalreview.com/2010/01/lyric-opera-to-offer-a-balanced-largely-conservative-lineup-next-season-with-11-fewer-performances/comment-page-1/#comment-940</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Sarchet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagoclassicalreview.com/?p=4342#comment-940</guid>
		<description>Over 17% less performances in 2010-11 season than in the late 1990&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over 17% less performances in 2010-11 season than in the late 1990&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
